The log is not an " option" but a legal base when the Internet Portal authenticates it. The knowledge base NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT and public security compliance have taken down this set of requirements in detail, but many remember to keep a log, which is unclear as to how long it will be left, and what to look for when it checks.
Network Portal AuthenticationWhere's the bottom of the law?
The three-tier structure is well-established: article 21 of the Cybersecurity Act requires that logs be kept for not less than six months; Ministry of Public Security Order No. 82 requires Internet access service providers to record and retain user logs for no less than 60 days; and the cybersecurity phase 2.0 requires central log collection, storage and security event audit.Network Portal AuthenticationIn other cases, the records of authentication, Internet access and traffic are mandatory and operators may face warnings, limited duration changes and serious liability for not retaining them.
V7 built-in capacity, boundaries of the independent log system
The knowledge base places particular emphasis on a capability boundary: V7 basic log capacity varies from that of the independent Log Audit system. V7 contains user-certification records, Portal logs, Internet time or traffic records and is capable of transmitting the interface to PS 32 platforms (e.g., kroner lines) to meet basic compliance. If it requires deep behaviour such as micro-letter, QQ, URL, DNS, GPS locations, etc., this is an issue for the Independent Log System, which relies on DPI depth resolution and PB level storage.
How long, how fast, there are specific numbers.
The retention days are configured in V7 to support 60 days, 180 days, and custom-defined. The log system white paper gives storage estimates formulas: one day ' s storage (G/s) equals 20 times the maximum flow rate (G/s), total capacity multiplied by storage days and 1.3 redundant days. For queries, about 5-20 seconds of search time is available at a scale of 1 billion, supporting export on condition.
Give a stored digital sense level: the white paper example contains a maximum traffic of 17G/s, approximately 340 G/S, and about 26 TB for 60 days. This means that log compliance is not as light as "open a switch" and it takes up real disks and increases with traffic linearity. So planningNetwork Portal AuthenticationWhen you comply, the storage days and disk capacity are counted together, not just "six months" but no space. The internal authentication records in V7 address where they go and the ILR system addresses how much they are stored and how detailed.
Two not to be expressed.
NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT Capacity Boundary Rule dead: "Absolute compliance" cannot be committed, which should be expressed as "accompaniing audit retroactive needs in accordance with the confirmed regulatory requirements and scope of project implementation"; and that the basic logs of certification systems should not be directly described as a capability for an in-depth behavioural auditing system. So when talking to clients about Internet Portal certification compliance, it is stated precisely that "we can provide audit link capabilities, specific compliance findings are identified in conjunction with local controls and project boundaries".
Finally, the emphasis is on the level of "regulating 2.0": it requires central log collection, storage and security incident audits to be brought up from a system that is legally bound. The certification logs generated by such clients as universities, government companies, etc., are only one category and are subject to centralized auditing with web-wide logs. In the case of compliance, the three levels of "cybersecurity laws plus 82 plus additional warranty 2.0" are used together for external purposes, in order to be complete. One sentence concludes: Log Audit, certified by Portal, basic compliance is being pushed by V7 accreditation records, leaving six months of bottom line; an in-depth behavior audit is handed over to the independent log system; When speaking to the public about compliance, what is left, how long and how fast it takes to bind project conditions and make promises.
The knowledge base divides the log type boundaries: the certification log records basic authentication events such as sessions, accounts, time; the NAT log records an address portal map for retroactive chain completion; and the online behavioural log records access to behavioral dimensions depending on the system and deployment range. Network Portal certificates build-up covers mainly the first two categories, while deep behavioural logs are independent. These three types of compliance options are made clear before clients know what is "reserved" specifically, rather than a general phrase, "we have a log."
When the External Network Portal certifications compliance, the length of time retained, field range and query processes must be confirmed by local regulation and project requirements, and no illustrative figures in the White Paper can be considered common commitments. Indicators are bound to hardware specifications, deployment architecture, data size, which is a boundary that the knowledge base has repeatedly emphasized.