Now, the online equipment of a student in the dorm is not a cell phone anymore. Cell phones, tablets, notebooks are punctures, smart watches, games, sound boxes, and some have television and surveillance. The system of billing for the WiFi network will be out of order on the first day of the line if it is designed with one person-to-one device. We've measured that there are now three to five devices per person, with a peak of 4,000 hand-in-hand terminals per building. This reality is that the billing system has to be met from structure to strategy.
Let's just figure out if it's a person or a device.
A fundamental problem is whether to charge and control the equipment in human units or in units. If it is purely based on equipment, no one accepts five pieces of equipment per student; if it is completely unlimited, another 10 with a machine-loading flow. Our usual practice is to set a school number, which is the subject of an artificial billing, by allowing for a certain amount of commonly used equipment to be tied beyond what can be added to the equipment without double counting. This is consistent with the fact that many endpoints are being filled with equipment and prevents its misuse.
Device recognition cannot be based on an address.
Multiple end management presupposes recognition of equipment. Early years, the Internet card physical address is used to identify the person who can now disguise it and cannot be trusted. We suggest combining multiple features: account entry, fingerprints of the device, access location, and a combination of this device to determine whether it is a common feature for the student. The new device appears for the first time, with an identification check that he or she is using in the usual list.
The simultaneous authentication pressure is to be measured separately.
The most direct pressure for multiple terminals is certification and distribution. One person has five devices connected to each other, and requests for authentication are five times greater. At night, the building starts at one time and requests for certification can be several times higher than the design value. When we do capacity planning, we multiply per capita equipment into a combination of them, not just by head count. The billing gateway and certification services need to be left full and reconnected so that every device does not run out of resources.
Speed limit is set to the package.
As mentioned earlier, speed-limiting is a pit. Multi-end scenario makes it even more obvious: four people in a dorm, 16 devices if they are limited to two trillions per device, and each one is distributed badly. The right course is to follow fast-track meals, such as 50 megagrams of food that this student buys, so all his usual equipment shares the 50 trillions, so whoever takes it, does not release them. So the student will balance himself, play a game with a much better notebook, less with a less-attended voice box, and the system will not worry about him.
The anti-piracy is more important than the limited amount.
Multiple terminals have also given a netting space. Your flow is divided by the next dormitory, which brings your account number to us. We suggest opening an unusual login reminder: the same account entry from different buildings and various fingerprints, direct marking and temporary freezing of the system, requiring students to verify it. More effective than simply limiting the number of equipment, is identifying anomalies. We've seen three devices that are used for sharing the heat with three devices in one whole layer, but only in numbers that are useless and can be identified by behaviour.
Access to student self-service management equipment
Finally, the billing system allows students to see and manage their own equipment. The current binding equipment, the recent traffic of each station, and where it is entered, are listed on the self-help page, and there is no key untied. We have counted it since we went online, and after open devices self-service management, the number of passengers with a connection to network and account abnormalities has been cut by almost half because the students themselves can detect problems and handle them.
Visitors' equipment is handled separately
One special feature of the multiple terminals is visitor equipment, such as cell phones used by parents to house their children, notebooks of the students’ s doorband. These should not be included in the list of common devices for students, much less in his package rate. We recommend that visitors take independent temporary certifications, time limits, speed limit rates, separate billings or free lines, and expire automatically.
Device ceiling to be configured
Allows the number of commonly used devices to be tied, and the system to be configured instead of dead. Some schools have eight, or a little bit limited to five, depending on the school situation. We suggest that this number be made as parameters for retraceable and that an unusually large number of bindings be warned. The configuration means that schools can adapt to policy rather than code change. The flexibility of equipment management determines whether multi-end strategies will be able to adapt to students ' web usage habits over time.