Go to Main Contents

:: Industry developments

How to choose the way to authenticate a campus network certification system that takes into account security and experience

In the campus network certification system, which way is authentication the most difficult part of the project? Controls are tight. The students and teachers have to go through every connection, and the phone calls are blown up.

Your position:Home > Content Centre > Industry News > > Text

The way the project is certified in a campus network certification system is one of the most difficult places to find. Controls are tight, students and teachers have to go through every connection, phone calls are blown up, accounts are loose, access is compromised, security incidents are not clear."Most advanced."The programme, depending on the actual school scene, spends money on knives.

Web certification is the most economical starting point.

For most schools, web certification is the first option that cannot be bypassed. The device connects to wireless networks, jumps out of login pages and accesses a code for account loss. Its best benefit is not to pick terminals, cell phones, notebooks, smart home appliances, or any client. The disadvantage is that every time you change your network environment, it may re-log, but it's a bit of a problem for users."It's controlled. It's traced."To do so, the experience of a small branch can be supplemented by remembering the login status and extending the session for a long time, without having to go out to feel.

We need to get the accounts straight.

Now, three or four devices in the hands of a student are normal and the authentication method must deal with this problem."One account can only bind one piece of equipment."The hard rules are that the dormitory alone will fill the space, and smart equipment can only open another account and manage it. More pragmaticly, the same account number multi-ends are allowed to be sent together, while capping and abnormal monitoring is set and issued at backstage, for example, by triggering an alert from both cities in the middle of the night. This way, we take care of real use without giving up safety bottom lines."Multi-equipment"As a default premise, not as an exceptional case.

Certificate authentication for fixed terminal

If there are a lot of fixed office computers in schools, such as terminals in teachers' rooms and administrative office computers, certification is more secure than the account code. Equipment pre-destination certificates, automatic access to network, non-sensibility of users, and not theft of certificates than passwords. The cost is that each device has to distribute and manage certificates, and moving terminals is expensive. So we generally recommend that you have to use them."The scenes are in different ways.": Fixed terminal certificates, mobile and visitor web certifications, rather than a single-size school. The mix strategy sounds complicated, and the actual feed is easier because each device is on the most economical path.

Visitors and things are connected to the network.

Security and experience conflicts arise in large part from the same authentication channels that put all people on board. Guests, construction units, and PACT terminals, whose security levels and convenience needs are quite different from those of students and teachers.

The hidden costs of the experience are accounted for.

When you choose the certification method, schools can easily charge only software authorization fees and not transport manpower."I forgot the password."We're going to have to put in a list of the jobs. And we're going to need a dedicated client, Andre and Apple version maintenance, and compatibility with the upgrades. We suggest that schools should have their carriers present at the selection sessions."How much more time we spend each year on every way?"The estimates put hidden costs on the table and decision-making is not biased.

No, it's the best. It's the best.

In the end, there is no standard answer to certification. Safe and safe programme experience is bound to be compromised, and unconscious programmes are bound to sacrifice a little bit of control. The key is that schools first sort their people, equipment, scenes, each one in the best match, and then go around with unusual monitoring."Balance"I understand."Every one of them."It's gonna go to the dead end."Each class has passed and key items have met the criteria"The plan is set.

The selection is to be recorded.

Once the authentication is done, take it."What's chosen, why, what's given up."It is easy to ignore, but a few years later the newcomer is not aware of the trade-offs and can change the way things are perceived. The decision-making record is not long, so just write down the scenario and the logic of choice. It is a map for follow-on carriers, avoiding the system being quietly twisted without anyone knowing it.

Self-help corridors for students

Authentication of related high-frequency operations, such as password changes, unwieldy lost equipment, checking of their own online terminals, which would explode if they were all to find a network centre. We suggest that we have a teacher/student self-help portal open and run the backstage for audit only. Self-service channels are opened, with a small line of stress, and teachers/students do not have to wait for minor matters.

Access Program I'll be right back. Telephone counselling