A student is now carrying a growing number of devices, mobile phones, notebooks, table boards, smart watches, blue-tooth sound boxes, games, and a more sophisticated dormitory with a smart-stage lamp and projector. The idea of an earlier account to tie up one device is not enough today. If the system is still equipped by one person, students change daily, recertification is extremely bad.
Let's get a look at the number of real devices.
The number of devices is set up before the maximum number of units is determined. It is easy to make a number that is less useful and less common, and more likely to be shared. The practical approach is to look at a true data sheet and see what the distribution of equipment is around the school system. Most schools run down and find that normal students are able to use both three and five devices on the line, each one of them being seven or eight. With this distribution, the ceiling is based on a simple, non-handcracking basis. We suggest that it should be relaxed early in the upper line, first observe real usage and then gradually tighten up to a reasonable value based on data, so don't just come up and die.
The equipment ceiling needs to be flexible.
Some students have a computer with a mobile phone, some of them create and do scientific equipment. A one-size-fits-all ceiling, either by making many devices or by allowing sharing. More flexible approaches are to set a limit on the majority, while students with real needs apply for higher ceilings and go easy on approval. Or use class packages, basic sets of equipment, which require more expensive ones. This ensures fairness and accommodates individual legitimate needs.
Small-scale devices for the network are handled separately
The students carry smart watches, sound boxes, lamps, and other small devices for networking, although they account for the number of equipment, are very low-flowing and mobile computers are not a grade. If they are also included in the master equipment ceiling, students will feel that they have a loss, and several little items will fill their seats. It would be more logical to group these low-flow network devices into separate categories, giving them an independent facility without crowding out the main equipment. Technology can be distinguished by type or flow characteristics.
Use bandwidth instead of equipment to prevent sharing
Many schools use restricted equipment to prevent account sharing, but this is a great mistake for many regular students. It is actually bandwidth and behavior rather than equipment that is more effective in preventing shared hands. If an account is shared by several people, the most immediate feature is that it is unusual traffic, long-term online equipment is loaded, or even traffic patterns are apparently not used by individuals. We suggest shifting the focus of anti-sharing from digital devices to controlled bandwidth and visual behaviour, both against abuse and without compromising normal students.
It's easy to change equipment and make it temporary.
Students change their mobile phones, borrow their computers, and use the tablet temporarily. It's a bad experience if you have to go through complex processes of untie and recertification every time you change equipment. The billing system allows the equipment to be added, deleted, quickly, so that students can manage the binding devices themselves on their personal pages, kick off the unwanted ones and add new ones. For temporary equipment, it gives a short-term access option, free of automatic release and no longer-term quotas. We see systems with cumbersome equipment management, where students switch to network centres, hate tracks; and we see self-help management, which is done by students in seconds. In the age of multi-equipment, ease of equipment management is itself a manifestation of service level.
Make the rules clear and reduce misunderstandings.
Many complaints about the number of devices are actually not known to students. He does not know how to tie up a few of them, but he doesn't know how to untie old equipment alone, and feels like a system pit once it is restricted. So the rules governing the equipment are clear: how to tie them, how to classify them, how to over-do it, how to apply more, and how to do so, and clearly, where they appear on the certification page or in the personal centre. The rules are transparent, so that the students themselves can handle them and complain less. The technical flexibility of equipment management, the operational clarity of rules and the fact that more than one person is no longer a contradiction.
More than one person’s equipment is a reality that the system of online billing must take care of this change. To figure out the number of real devices, cap-flexive, small equipment classification, bandwidth protection, ease of sharing, and rules are clear, these things will satisfy both normal multi-facility use and maintenance of the bottom line for prevention of abuse.