Once the system is online, there's a problem with the house: an account is shared by several people. A student buys a month of bags, his whole neighborhood has its own number on it, the exit bandwidth is eaten out and the regular payer is slow."Why can't I borrow it?"This article on anti-piracy, how to keep sharing within reasonable limits without locking normal students to death.
Let's make sure we know where the shared border is.
The sharing is not a thief's defense. A student has his own cell phone, computer, and tablet, which makes perfect sense to share an account. What really stands in the way of an outflow of accounts for non-residents or for an account number to feed the entire layer. We suggest that the rules be clear: the use of devices by the same person is permitted, and the borrowing outside the room is prohibited.
The number of equipment and the MAC are set to be the first lock.
The most common practice is to limit the number of devices, such as an account allowing three, which is more than enough to untie."Tell the account code to someone else."We suggest that the ceiling be set for three to five, and allow students to manage a list of bindings. Too dead to tie up, students change their phones to cover their transport, and the worksheet explodes. MAC is not a panacea, but it raises the threshold for sharing and is adequate for ordinary scenes.
The simultaneous distribution of sessions and single account bandwidth limits
Even if the number of devices is not exceeded, it is clearly shared by an account that can be downloaded from 10 devices at the same time. The billing system allows for a maximum of both conversational and single account bandwidth, such as allowing only two or three active sessions at the same time, with a total rate capping. Even if the password leaks, people are squeezed and so far less experienced. We have seen one school with an unlimited number of equipment, with one account line attached to the whole floor, and pay-for-school students can read a page. Double bandwidth and meetings are really draining the shared gains.
An anomaly recognition captures a stubborn sharing.
The rules are not in place to stop the borrowings. The same account is a short time from different floors, from different APs to frequent lines or from long-term full bandwidth, and the system can be marked for anomaly and manually verified. We suggest that the billing backstages be accompanied by an unusual list of transfers every week, with reminders or limits on confirmed lending rather than a single cut. Behaviour recognition is the last step, small but accurate, appropriate for a few stubborn cases. It relies on setting a normal multi-equipment threshold before it kills a normal user.
The network is being diverted to reduce the motivation for dingling accommodation accounts
Many of the sharings take place in a friend's house, using a dorm account. If the school provides a regular temporary network of visitors and sweeps up a few small time-rate privileges, students do not have to borrow their own number outside the bank. We suggest that visitors access and anti-piracy cooperation be done, so that they require a legal exit that is more effective than simply blocking."Borrowing number"Changed"Clean the visitor's code."And the motive for sharing is a big missing part.
The rules are to be explained to the students.
We suggest that the guidelines for admission and the dormitories convention should be clear: account numbers are limited to self-service devices, no borrowing is prohibited, unusual flows are restricted. Students know rules and they have a fear when lending; they also know that normal equipment is not affected and there is no reason to panic. If you do not explain it, students find that kicking only makes them feel like they're having a system but instead become legal. Transparency enforcement, stealing only works and does not damage the experience of normal users.
The rules of the dormitory are to be discussed together.
Technology is limited to most sharing, but what really works is a consensus among students. We suggest that we take"Accounts are restricted to self-use, no borrowing."We have also seen buildings that allow students to take a self-governing network order, and are reminded by their peers that it is more timely than the system. The prevention of theft is not against schools, but about keeping most regular paying students at the same speed.
The system of house-to-house billing is not based on a single check, but rather on equipment restrictions, bandwidth caps, behavioural recognition, and the diversion of visitors. The key is to balance sharing with normal appearance and put rules ahead. Too many dead students bounced back, and those who paid too little were losing their way, according to the reality in their schools.