Network quality comparison
Traditional broadband packages use public network-sharing bandwidth. Hundreds of households in a small area use operator broadband, with peak congestion. From 7 to 11 pm, everyone watch videos and the Internet is basically Cataton.
The WiFi system of flats is usually exclusive.
The network is agreed and the apartment cannot be changed.
The WiFi system of apartments is more in line with modern tenants’ needs, based on network quality.
Service Experience Comparison
Traditional broadband packages are a problem for operators. Call the customer service, line up, fly orders, and masters come in. This process may take half or even one day.
The apartment WiFi billing system is a problem for the apartment.
The package modification, trouble management, and complaint procedures are templates for operators.
The apartment WiFi system is more flexible.
The apartment WiFi billing system is closer to the tenant than it is in service experience.
Comparison of cost transparency
The tenant’s suite is agreed to in the traditional broadband year. What is the $50 monthly package, how it should be due, and the tenant may not know. And the operator’s baskets change often, and the tenant finds that prices are higher or unknown.
The renter can check for every consumption, how much traffic you use and how many days you have left.
The renter has to invoicing, call, upload information, etc.
The apartment WiFi billing system is more reassuring for tenants from a cost-neutral perspective.
Tenant autonomy comparison
The renter pulls the broadband himself, paying for it. It seems autonomous, but once paid, it is tied up. Operators are not well served and tenants suffer.
The renter’s choice is not forced to bear the money for a year.
The apartment WiFi bill system, the tenant changes the suite next month, without any constraints.
The renter’s system of billing for the apartment WiFi is more respectful of the tenant’s choice.
A comparison of the applicable scenes
The renters use the network occasionally, mainly mobile phones, and broadband is intended to save money.
The apartment WiFi billing system is more suitable for renters with high Internet demand.
Long-lease apartments, youth apartments, service apartments where renters are demanding the network and apartment WiFi billing systems are more appropriate.
The apartment WiFi system is in the early stages and is cost-effective.
If the apartment is just about providing a basic network, it is not very demanding for its quality, and traditional broadband packages are less expensive annually. If the apartment uses the network as a service and a point of sale, it is willing to invest in and manage it, and the apartment WiFi system is more valuable in the long term.
There are now many apartments that mix the two modes. Provide traditional broadband year as a base option for low-demand tenants to pull themselves. And provide apartment WiFi billing as an upgrade option, allowing high-risk tenants to choose. This covers the needs of different tenants.