The Portal certification system addresses who can access the Internet, but one thing is equally important after it is online: how to divide bandwidth. If all traffic is stolen without discrimination, there are customers who brush video and squeeze the bandwidth of the cashier system, or if individual users run full bandwidth to keep others from breaking their pages. This is a priority issue that is being addressed by the bandwidth classification. It is not an alternative relationship to authentication, which confirms identity, determining where and how much resources this identity will be.
First, we'll open the flow to use.
The first step is to sort out the traffic in the network for several purposes. For example, there are at least four categories: cash and transactions, surveillance, office, customer access. These four categories vary widely, with a direct impact on business, and the customer network is slower than it has been experienced. They must be combined with the operator to confirm that they cannot be technically self-taped because the key operations of different industries differ from one sector to another, and hospitals, schools, factories and so forth.
Key operations to be reserved and prioritized
The first tier of the hierarchy is to reserve bandwidth for key operations and to raise its priority to the highest. The saving means that it can be preserved even if other flows run full, without being squeezed. This is done by assigning a guaranteed bandwidth and high priority to key operations in flow control strategies or applications types. Here is an easy point: the setting aside is based on actual business volume, with too much wasteful bandwidth in the head taken, not enough at a very small critical time, and requires looking at a realistic operational data re-allocation.
Customer-type traffic is limited in volume
The core of the hierarchy is to prevent uncontrolled expansion of non-critical flows. Customers’ access to such traffic should limit a total bandwidth and place it on lower priority levels. So that even if guests were to draw their videos centrally, they would not cross this line to crowd out key business. The overall limit depends on how much is left after export bandwidth less critical business reservations, while leaving some redundancy to respond to sudden outbreaks.
Every user is bound to be alone.
Limiting the totals alone would be a problem: within the aggregate, a few users could fill the bandwidth, others were given very little, had as bad an experience as they were and it was difficult to explain when complaints became online. So there is a layer of user restrictions that allows each user to receive roughly the same bandwidth. The value of this layer is not in bandwidth, but equity, which determines the same network fee, and the user’s experience is not so much different.
Priority is not equal to no ceiling
If there is an unusual flow of key operations, such as repeated transmissions of surveillance equipment or misallocation leading to a doubling of traffic, without a cap, it will eat the entire export and cause total failure. So even for the most critical category, a reasonable ceiling should be set, which is clearly above its normal use, reserved for sudden-onset space, while preventing it from losing control over the net.
The graded strategy changes with the time period.
Many locations have different business priorities at various times. At peaks, trading and queue systems are most important; when closed, it may be data synchronization and backup running, with customers moving almost zero. If the strategy is not fixed, they waste bandwidth to low-priority traffic during peak periods or limit simultaneous tasks that could otherwise run.
The grade is verified by real business.
When bandwidth is graded, it cannot run a number with just one speed-tracking software, even if validated. The real validation is to press down with real business: while key operations are running, multiple terminals are to run large traffic simultaneously to see whether the actual performance of key operations has been affected and whether each user’s speed limit really flattens the speed. This test must be done during the low peaks of the operation and the person concerned should be notified in advance so that it is not mistook for real failure.
The graded strategy is to be tied to the authentication.
The bandwidth classification is really effective, and it is tied to the authentication identity. For each new user type added to a business, it determines which one of the user groups belongs to and receives which package to use.
Two of the most common configuration deviations
The first category is the use of a master bandwidth, with no user limits per user. As a result, a few users have full bandwidth during peak periods, others experience it very poorly, while the overall bandwidth looks rich. The second category is that each user has too small a limit and normal applications are not running fast, but the user will be able to feedback the network at a slow pace, but the total is far from the ceiling.