Compliance is not a slogan. It's one section of the three types of log.
Schools do web logs, which are most confusing. By capability boundary, the logs have three categories: authentication logs record authentication sessions, accounts, time-based events; NAT log records addresses and port maps to supplement source links; Internet behavioural logs record access behaviours depending on system and deployment range. The three groups combine to form evidence chains that can be broken by person, account number, terminal, time-retroactivity. Only certification logs can be found where they went; behavior logs can only be kept and not run for whom; NAT logs bridge internal and external network addresses, missing them, and then break rings.
It's not the same thing to have a system of authentication and independent logs.
NATSHEL_BRAND’s capability boundaries are clear: V7 basic log capabilities vary from those of the independent NatSHEL_LOG_AUDIT system and cannot be described directly as an in-depth behavior audit. V7 built-in certification records, Portal logs, Internet hours and traffic to meet billing compliance and record retention on a base network, and can also provide a basis for the implementation of P32 recognition platforms. But if full flow seven layers of application logs, social media behaviour, GPS location, PB level storage, and st based search, that is the work of the log system’s own product line. The large size of schools and the high volume of traffic, in order to cooperate with public security in detecting specific behaviour tracks, require a superb log system that cannot be expected to be commissioned.
Retention time is confirmed by regulation and project, without a conclusion for regulatory purposes
The Cybersecurity Act requires that logs be kept for no less than six months, and the Ministry of Public Security Decree No. 82 requires Internet access providers to keep user logs on the Internet, etc. 2.0 emphasizes central log collection and security incident audits. But it is necessary to verify how long they are stored, what fields remain, and how they can be searched, according to local public safety network monitoring requirements and projects, that there is no substitute for a board or absolute compliance.
Indicators cannot be separated from hardware and deployment to promise
The indicators mentioned in the information, such as sec-scale queries, PB-levels and billion-grade searches, must be tied to hardware specifications, deployment structures, data size and version conditions. Indicators without binding conditions cannot commit to external commitments. For example, storage capacity is estimated by using a maximum flow rate multiplied by a redundancy factor, which can be calculated daily, provided that it knows the daily peak flow and retention days.
How do the certification and log systems work out?
The typical compliance option is NE-80 gateways for flow control and collection, log systems for storage analysis and screens, public security designated platforms for compliance promotion, V7 NATSHEL_AUTH_BILLING system for internalization of authentication records. Small campus single machines are deployed enough to be distributed in large or multischool areas to avoid single points. The principles of judgement are simple: only basic compliance is met, V7 is built; full traffic depth audits and behaviour traceabilitys are required, and a log system is added up; public security works with investigations into specific user behaviour, which requires a log system.
The log is an asset management and a liability boundary.
The logs are kept as compliant and secure assets. Without or irregular, operators are warned to change them, have serious criminal liability; public security records are not available for taking evidence, and illegal leads are broken here. So the campus network certification system cannot talk about logs for long enough, but how the three types of logs work out, how the authentication systems and log systems fit together, how the indicators bind hardware and how the duration is monitored.
What can public security offer to cooperate with the investigation?
When it comes to public security, the system can provide basic data for matching 32 forms of command, using user names, Internet access times and IP addresses; when you add up logs, you can also give in-depth data such as access to URLs, social media behaviour, location information. The system directly confronts public security identification platforms like succession lines, where data formats are compliant. But much depends on which competency line is deployed: only V7 internalization can be used for basic authentication records, and the full flow trace must have a log system.
What's the count for storage? Don't shoot your head.
Log storage has a formula: the maximum traffic rate per day is 20 times the total capacity multiplied by 1/3 redundancy. For example, the maximum flow of 17 Gs is 340 Gs per second and about 60 TBs. This algorithm comes from white papers, which first asks for peak daily traffic and retention days before selling to schools, gives clear disk numbers using formula instead of dumping a beautiful but unconditional PB level. Indicators are tied and deployed to withstand hard-wired tests and avoid being used as promises.
How do you turn the compliance pressure into demand before sale?
Faced with schools that are only required to meet public security requirements, it is said that the V7 internal certification records are being sent to the interfaces for basic compliance; that the V7 in small and medium-sized sites is sufficient; and that there are more users of the PB storage and second-level check of the independent log system, both commercial and tertiary. Two figures are highlighted: the maximum daily flow rate, the number of days of storage required.