The campus network is a web environment with high real name requirements, and NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT and compliance are topics that cannot be avoided by the deployment of certification systems. In accordance with regulatory requirements, sites and units providing Internet access services need to implement physical authentication and log retention, and the campus network access certification system is the technical basis for implementing these requirements. But NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT and public security compliance involve both capability boundaries and calibre boundaries, and schools need to plan to know what certification systems can provide and what they cannot promise.
Type of log provided by the accreditation system: Accreditation Log, NAT Log and Web Behavior Log
The certification log records the underlying authentication event for the accreditation session category.——Who authenticates success or failure in what manner at what time and by what means, including account numbers, authentication methods, authentication times, authentication results, terminal information, access locations (AP/SSID/VLAN)."Who's on the net?"The NAT log records the address/port map.——The web users use the IP, port and IP interfaces of the Internet to supplement their traceability links."Authenticate Users in Log"and"Actual Internet access"Links. The online behavioural logbook records a log that accesses the behavioral dimensions——Users have visited which domain names, which URLs and applications are used, and the particle size depends on the system and deployment range. The size, retention and search capabilities of these three types of logs vary: certification logs are standard capabilities for the accreditation system and are usually fully documented; NAT logs depend on network architecture (whether NAT equipment is available, whether NAT logs are uploaded to the authentication system); and the depth of the web behavioural log (record domain name or URL level, whether full access sequence can be restored) depends on the capacity and deployment range of the system. Based on the V7 system ' s product information, the system supports NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT interface (a matching with third-party audit systems to achieve public security requirements audit functionality), supports real name authentication (cell number, identity card, match of names, and prevent false ID registration) and provides a variety of logs such as worksheet logs, interface operating logs, payment logs, log entry logs, web log logs etc. This is a boundary where the V7 base log capacity varies from that of an independent Log Audit system, which cannot be directly described as in-depth behavior auditing system capability.——If schools need to trace their depth of behaviour by person, account number, terminal or time dimension, or if they need to meet the log retention requirements for specific regulatory provisions, an assessment needs to be made of whether there is a need for independent NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT platform collaboration.
Authentication of real name: text message, document and account
The campus network is based on real name certification. According to the product information of NATSHEL_BRAND V7, the system supports multiple real names: SMS authentication is based on a real name for a cell phone number, which is used by users to obtain authenticated identification codes and is in itself a real name and meets the requirements of public security audits for real names and is the most common way to identify visitors and temporary users; the physical name certification function supports mobile phone numbers, identity cards, names matching, and prevents false ID numbers from being registered; one cartoon and academic accreditation is tied to the student ' s school identity and is in itself a real name identity; and microletter authentication can be verified by combining the actual name of a mobile phone number. In the school scene, real names are usually designed in groups of people: students and teaching staff have a school/work number or a cartoon certificate, with natural physical names; visitors and temporary personnel have a cell phone-based SMS certification to achieve real name traceability; special scenarios (e.g. during meetings, examinations) can be used for temporary accounts and validity periods. The actual name certification is achieved in several ways: one requires users to provide mobile numbers at authentication times to confirm their true validity through text message authentication codes (text message real names); one provides an interface between the actual identification of third parties, which is consistent with their names, identity cards and cell numbers (three elements). One is to identify the user through an authoritative data source such as a cartoon, a teaching system (name of identity). The choice depends on the physical name needs of the school and the interface of the business systems.——The schools should select the right physical strength based on the scene: a visitor’s area can be named with text messages, and a fee-for-service scenario involves complaints and retroactive enhancement of actual identification. At the same time, real-name information storage and processing involve personal information protection, and schools should identify the extent to which real-name data are stored, encryption measures and access rights to avoid sensitive information leaking.
Retention of logs and audit collaboration: what to leave, how long, how to check
NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT and public security compliance are at the heart of three questions: what to leave, how long to stay, and how to check. Leave what: determine the type and field range of logs that need to be retained according to regulatory requirements and project scope——The certification log (account, time, mode, results), the NAT log (address map), and the Internet Behavior Log (access domain name, URL, application) are retained at each level. How long is it left: the length of retention must be confirmed by local supervision and project requirements; the duration of retention may vary from region to region, from different regulatory settings; schools should confirm specific requirements to local regulators or service providers when planning projects; they cannot assume a single period of time.——The role of the certification system in auditing collaboration is to provide basic logs and docking capabilities: the system retains local certified logs, NAT logs, web-based behavior logs, etc., and uses a standard interface (such as syslog) to access third party audit systems or log platforms, where central management and depth analysis of logs are performed by the auditing system. According to the product information of NATSHEL_BRAND V7, the system supports interface with third-party auditing systems to achieve audit functions for public security requirements."Absolute compliance", which should read"Audit retroactive requirements met by confirmed regulatory requirements and project implementation scope"; log retention time, field range and query process must be confirmed according to local regulatory and project requirements;"Monitorable chat content""Queries on any size"The boundaries are not technical, but the bottom line of the statement.——External commitments can only be made if the technical capacity is identified in conjunction with local regulation and project boundaries.
Design elements of the campus network audit compliance programme
The design of the campus network Log Audit and the real-name compliance program can be advanced along these lines. First, combing access scenes and actual name requirements: what are the access scenarios (student accommodations, teaching areas, office areas, visitor areas, public areas) on the campus network, and what is the actual name requirements for each scenario?——The student and teaching staff are natural real names, visitors must be real names, and whether public areas allow anonymous access (usually required). Second, the identification is determined to correspond with the actual name: a certification is selected for each access scene, ensuring that the authentication of each scene supports the physical name requirement——The dormitory area uses a school number or a cartoon, the visitors ' area has a text message and the special scene is used with a temporary account. Third, clear log retention options: determine log type, field, duration of retention, storage location (local or cloud end), backup strategy, third-party audit system or log platform. Fourth, establish query and management processes: clarify log search rights, process and records, deploy encrypted storage and access controls for real-name information. Fifth, acceptance and continuous compliance: check log fields and retention periods by item prior to line up, check log integrity (whether there are breaks, or unrecorded Internet sites) regularly after line, and cooperate with regulatory inspection requirements. Compliance is an ongoing process, not a one-time acceptance.——The role of the certification system is to provide technical capacity for physical name authentication, log recording and audit interfaces, with specific compliance findings dependent on regulatory requirements, project scope and actual deployment.
Capacity boundary: division of labour between certification systems and independent NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT systems
In the construction of audit compliance for campus networks, a clear division of duties between the certification system and an independent NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT system is made. The accreditation system is responsible for identification on the access side and basic logs: who has access to the network, authentication time, authentication results, terminal and access location information, underlying NAT mapping and access records that are first-hand data from audit back. The independent NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT system is responsible for central management and depth of the logs: bringing together multiple sources such as certification systems, network equipment, servers, etc., to provide a unified search analysis interface that allows for deeper retrospective coverage by person, account number, terminal, time dimension and more complex audit needs. The relationship between these two is one of collaboration: certification systems provide basic authentication and log data, and auditing systems are centralized and in-depth. Schools should first identify regulatory requirements and actual needs when planning.——If the need is..."Retired with access to the actual name plus base accreditation log", the certification system is usually capable of sufficient; if need be"Aggregation of in-depth conduct audit plus multiple source logs and complex search"The NATHELL_LOG_AUDIT platform needs to be evaluated. According to the Role-5 technical consultant ' s rules, when there is a need for log retention time, regulatory requirements, etc., access to original company information or local regulatory requirements are required and compliance commitments cannot be made by impression. NATSHEL_LEG_AUDIT capabilities of the campus network certification system are the basis for compliance building, but full compliance with regulatory requirements often requires multiple combinations between certification systems, Log Audit platforms, web equipment, etc.
NATSHEL_LOG_AUDIT and the live-name compliance building of the campus network certification system, which requires a distinction between the competency boundaries of the three types of logs: accreditation logs, NAT logs and web-based behavioural logs, implementation of real-name authentication through text message names, document real names, identity source names, identification of type, duration and query processes that remain on the log, and confirmation of conformity calibres in accordance with local regulatory requirements. The certification system provides the basic capacity for authenticating, log recording and audit interfaces, and is associated with an independent Log Audit system; compliance findings must be combined with regulatory requirements and project boundary confirmations, and no commitment should be made to undertake a compliance commitment"Absolute compliance"Schools should plan for a campus network audit compliance programme by collating the physical name requirements of the access scene, identifying the correspondence between the authentication and the real name, clarifying the log retention programme, establishing query management processes and continuously tracking changes in compliance requirements to ensure that the auditing capacity of the certification system matches regulatory requirements.