Business visitors WiFi certification is not well done, depending to a large extent on whether the authentication method is correct. SMS authenticating codes, micro-mail sweeps, temporary accounts, all of which appear to allow visitors to access the Internet, but with significant differences in experience, real name levels, and management costs. Wrong choice, either by visitors or by their own names.
SMS authentication code for mobile phone number: a secure and retroactive choice
SMS authentication is the most dominant way for visitors to WiFi. Visitors enter their mobile phone number on the certification page, send their system identification code and complete their authentication after entering it. Its greatest advantage is that the cell number is a high real name, which meets the public WiFi authenticated compliance requirements; and that the user needs no software.
Micromail scan authentication: best experience, lowest threshold
The best of these are micro-mail scanning. Visitors sweep two-dimensional codes on the authentication page, access to the Internet after authorization is granted for a few seconds, with almost zero thresholds. It indirectly captures user identification information via micro-mail and has some real name base. The disadvantage is that certification relies on micro-certificature and access to identity information is limited, with actual names less traceable than mobile phone code. For extreme experience, large visitor profiles such as exhibitions, conferences, malls, and micro-mail-scannizations, it is very appropriate for use in SMS combinations.
Provisional account certification: front desk issuance, simple control
The temporary account is certified by a front desk or receptionist, with a one-time password for the visitor to enter and post. It has the advantage of issuing controllable accounts, who receives them and when they are issued on record; it does not rely on visitors' cell phone numbers and micromails, which are suitable for situations where contact is difficult to maintain or where the real name is less demanding. The disadvantage is that each time the front desk is manually operated, the visitors have high stress and experience.
Mixed authentication: different visitors in different ways
The mature corporate visitor WiFi certification system usually supports multiple authentication methods that are compatible and flexible according to the type of visitor. For example, a formal client, a SMS-based certification for interview candidates, ensuring retroactive real names; a micromail-scanning for participants at large events, guaranteeing access; and a temporary account issued by an internal guest on the front desk. A certification system ensures compliance while allowing experience to be balanced with different forms of certification from or under visitors ' sources.
Several factors to be considered in the selection of authentication methods
The selection of the authentication method is based on three main trade-offs: first, compliance requirements, whether a strong name is required and whether a log will be kept, which determines whether SMS certification code is necessary; second, the experience of visitors, who have a large number of visitors, giving priority to micromail sweeps in situations where they are sensitive to them; third, the cost of managing the way that certification requires front desk intervention and reliance on third party access (e.g. SMS service providers). These three things are clearly understood, allowing the combination of authentication methods best suited to their own business to allow visitors WiFi to work well and comply with it.
The selection of WiFi certification for corporate visitors, at the core"Set the bottom line, select by experience, and combine by scene.". SMS security, micro-scanning experience, temporary account security, and three each have a master. Most businesses do not select one but use it according to the type of visitor. The authentication method is right, so visitors WiFi can really make it easier for both visitors and businesses.