When network access to the certification system is online, it's not technical difficulties that are most common."Balance of security and experience"The safety system is too tight, staff members are rife with complaints and even affect operational efficiency at every time; the tubes are too loose, access systems are in disfigured, security is inundated. A good access system should be made unserviceable to the vast majority of people while maintaining strict control over a real high-risk scenario.
Bad access, and security fails.
This is a very easy rule to ignore: if access to the system is too poor, users will try to bypass. Staff members have failed to certify repeatedly, re-inform every breakup, compliance checks are endless. Users either ask IT for repairs or turn down authentication, modify configuration, and use uncontrolled access. The result is access to the system."It's a dead end."The goal of security is not to be missed. So, the experience is not an additional element of access; it is a prerequisite for safety to be achieved.
Leveld by scene: the tight spot, the loose place.
The balance of experience and security is managed in a situational manner, rather than all access at all levels. For high-risk scenarios such as server areas, core operations areas, and wiring terminals, certification should be rigorous and multiple factor validation where necessary; for risk-neutral scenarios such as daily staff work, account numbers plus Seamless Authentication, which ensures ease; and for low-risk scenarios such as public visitor areas, lightweight temporary certification.
Use Seamless Authentication to reduce repeat intrusion
Seamless Authentication (MAC Auto-Locking) is one of the most effective tools for improving experience. After user first authenticating, the system records terminal information and then automatically releases it when the same device re-enters without repeated login. For such scenarios as fixed terminals, personal office equipment, NatSHELL_SEAMLES_AUTH can handle"Every time you access, you log in."Changed"Almost no sense."But Seamless Authentication should be used with restraint, and public equipment, multiple-person accounts, high-security areas are not suitable for use to avoid security holes."Which scenes are unconscious and which must be authenticated"And experience and security can be the same.
Compliance and exception mechanisms: do not allow strategy to be misdirected
Access strategies are improved without individual special circumstances, such as the non-registration of new incoming staff equipment, non-compliance with temporary visiting vendor equipment, and special terminals in the R&D environment. Such scenarios can have a direct impact on operations if they are blocked by access strategies. The system therefore needs to design exceptions and exemptions: exceptional cases allow temporary access through approval processes, temporary billings and temporary equipment are time-bound, automatic recovery.
Continuous attention to experience indicators
Balance experience and security are not merely perceived, but speak with data. After you get online, a number of indicators need to be kept in focus: certification success rates, average time lags for authentication, non-conscious entry rate, user impairments and duplicate login complaints. If the certification success rate is low, delays are high, there are many complaints, indicating strategies or experiences, adjustment needs to be checked proactively; if some types of scene barriers are concentrated, consideration must be given to whether they are too rigorous or cumbersome."It's good and safe."The state.
Network access certification system balanced user experience and security, with the core being:"Manage by scenario, use no senses, maintain exceptions and keep the data optimal"Security is the goal, experience is a prerequisite, not an opposing one, but both. To be able to take care of that tight and convenient place so that access can be truly accepted by users and also secure.