The billing system is about how much money it pays, and the bandwidth control is about how many roads it gives its users. The two sets of capabilities are separated, but they are in the same strategic engine: a single price for the billing and a lower limit on bandwidth controls. Many people don't know that this band has a minimum size of 32 Kbps, which is not a head, but a step necessary to prevent abuse in apartments, factory accommodations.
WiFi web billing system32 Kbps particle sizes mean what?
32Kbps, which means that a user or group of users can move up and down the thin step: not in a rough line like " Speed 2M" but in a little bit lower by 32K. This is useful for rentals, dormitories, individual users hanging on BT, watching 4K slow down the whole layer, operators can precisely squeeze to where they are used without injury, instead of cutting all the speeds and punishing the honest people together.
Bandwidth control can also be done in dimensions: by type of operation (web page, video, separate queue for download), by user or group of users (with different ceilings for different groups), by time period (inhabitants are less loose during the day and crowding at night). Multidimensional combinations allow limited export bandwidth to be used against a knife, preserving both experience and cost of exporting, so that one does not eat out the entire building late at night.
WiFi web billing systemWhat kind of recognition supports speed limits?
The NE-80 current gateway identifies more than 3600 network applications, 11 classifications and over 1600 common protocols in a megabeaze environment, with an average online recognition rate of about 98%. It is only speed-bound if you know whether the user runs P2P or micromail. NE-80 supports 8-way bridges, 100,000 users, 20G vomiting, 8 million connections, which are the basis for large scale speed limits and flow controls, and is the bottom gas from high school and park density scenes that dare to go up speed limits.
But performance indicators are about boundaries: NE-80 numbers are specific hardware specifications and capabilities that cannot be removed from the current network. The correct expression is "to be reached under matching hardware and deployment conditions" rather than "to be found everywhere." The role rules describe performance indicators as "to be tied to hardware specifications, web-tops, combustible models, pressure measurement methods," which means that labels cannot be used for commitment purposes before sale.
WiFi web billing systemSpeed limit and billing accuracy are two things.
One thing that can be confused is that speed limits do not represent a calculation of costs. Speed cuts are real-time bandwidth, which accounts for time or flow accumulations. For example, the system has to be able to calculate the traffic by volume and NAC is accurate, so that each session is properly charged; it is long on schedule and can be settled within a certain period of time and shut down. Bandwidth controls only guarantee "no crowding" and "no counting" and they cannot be separated from one another.
So a proper WiFi network billing system, with bandwidth control for fairness and a clear accounting engine for both. The speed limit is not fixed, and the reconciliation at the end of the month is not working; only the cost is running out, the exit is eaten by one person, and everyone else is scolded.
WiFi web billing systemThe speed limit strategy for the campus and dormitory differs.
The same bandwidth controls, with different strategic focus in the campus and dormitories. Accommodations are more time-sensitive: fewer people are released during the day, crowding at night, distributed in combination with AP and user groups; campus buildings are better lined up to business types, maintain priority for office and videoconferences, and hold down downloads and P2Ps.
NE-80 currents can be used for both route and bandwidth distribution in two scenarios, but strategies are to be written by the population: staff groups, visitors' groups, dormitories each with different ceilings and priority. The benefits of a 32 Kbps limit range are only then shown, so that they can be fine enough to "the overall speed limit of the late peak of the dormitory group, but not one person at any level." They are fair and not as good as they are.
WiFi web billing systemA few taboos about bandwidth control configuration
The first taboo for bandwidth control is full speed with one cut. The exit is limited to a very low level, and the honest person is tied up, and complaints are immediately filed. Rightly, it is classified according to user group and type of application, focusing on office and video, press P2P, and leaving room for normal browsing. 32 Kbps' particle size serves this fineness, not for nothing.
The second taboo is to regularize the speed limit as punishment. Some are sometimes held up for a while and experience is more likely to be broken. The speed limit should be dynamic adjustment, peak collection, flattening, and matching the billing alert with the expiration of time, rather than static punishment.
The third taboo is that the speed limit should be removed from recognition talks. NE-80 does not apply, and the speed limit can only be based on an IP card, P2P is unstuffed, and micro-letters are broken. Identification is granted only if it is allowed, which is why bandwidth control and DPI identification must go together, with the last one being disabled.
WiFi web billing systemHow do you reconcile speed limit and billing?
For example, the flow of system withholdings and NE-80 identification statistics is right, with too much difference between recognition and accounting. Operators regularly crosscheck both sides, and then vary when they find deviations, avoiding "user-saying that there are so many delays in spending on systems" disputes and avoiding a loss of income due to P2P missing.
Long-time, long-term and time-related: online hours are based on authentication sessions and the length of time that you have to match your export of NAT sessions. If you stop a session in time, you will be able to complain; if you stop, it will be more difficult to pay back. Speed limits and billing share a set of meeting data, which is checked together at the reconciliation point, so that they can be fair and accurate and leaked.