In the way Internet Portal certification is registered, text message authentication and micro-credit authentication are the two most used. One has to be secure one more step, one easier to handle the real name. Many operators have a question of " Which is the actual use" but the answer is not optional, while the Cybersecurity Act and Public Security Department Order No. 82 require a hard-core backup.
Network Portal AuthenticationWhy can't you usually get a text-letter authentication?
The knowledge base classifies SMS certification as a high security level, with the key judgement being that "the project needs an actual name certification? Need for a retroactive source? Need to support SMS authentication." Because SMS authentication is using a mobile phone number and naturally traceable sources that allow it to handle public security audit requirements. In wireless non-traffic locations (hotels, malls, airports, etc.), the Ministry of Public Security has issued Order No. 82 explicitly requiring that user logbooks be recorded and retained online, which is essential to meet real names and tracers and cannot be skipped.
The knowledge base also states that the name of V7 is not a cell phone number, but rather a match between cellular numbers, names, and identity cards to prevent registration with false ID numbers. This is particularly important for such public security-oriented sites as hotels and airports.Network Portal AuthenticationThis match behind the login page is key to the viability of compliance audits.
We can verify it, but we can't run naked.
The best way to do this is to scan the user code. But the knowledge base specifically warns that micro-letter authentication can satisfy public security audit requirements by matching a cell phone number with a real name check. That is, it is not compatible to tie a cell phone without a photo-scan code and to use a real name in a location where a real name is needed. It is common practice for a micro-mail-scan or a micro-scan (user-to-user-to-select protocol to log into the consent clause to successfully connect to a tied cell phone) to either keep the message smooth and fill the actual name.
Yes.Network Portal AuthenticationHow do you do these two ways?
The site map of the knowledge base includes both micro-mails and text messages as recommendations or options on campus WiFi and hotels. It is usually combined when you land: preferred micro-letters or small programs reduce login friction, while retaining SMS certification as a real name, even requiring a phone to be named once for the first time before being allowed to walk unwittingly. V7 template management supports PC, mobile phone adaptation and customization, so operators can release both ways on the network Portal authentication log pages, allowing users to choose, but the actual name chain at backstage must be closed.
A few practical points of experience and security balance.
First, the term "good experience" should not be understood as "less real name" and compliance is a bottom line; secondly, real names (cell numbers, names, identity cards) of Internet Portal certified information are compared to V7 to prevent false ID number registrations; thirdly, the log-on-generated authentication records will be sent to the public security 32 identification platform (such as Rents), which is basic compliance capability, with small and medium-sized sites being built in V7.
Micro-credit micro-procedure certification as a compromise is worth listing: the process is user networking, selection of program login, consent to service terms, connection success, and binding of mobile phones. It takes down the " experiential" and "real name" into two steps, connecting users first, then recapturing them without losing their user or missing their real name. With this process, the chain store has obtained both experience and economy: the experience with Internet Portal authentication is micro-letter and small procedure, and the bottom line of the actual trace is tied by text message and cell number.
Add a more detailed regulation: Portal's Internet monitoring programme makes it clear that the Ministry of Public Security Decree No. 82 is directed at "wireless non-trading sites" for security audits, and that wireless coverage of hotels, malls, airports, etc. is the focus of supervision. So the network Portal certified that such places cannot be registered only and that online behaviour should be reported to the public security audit system.
In the case of compliance with the physical name of the Internet Portal, accurate speech is "to meet audit retroactive requirements in accordance with confirmed regulatory requirements" rather than to speak out about absolute compliance. The knowledge base’s compliance-calibre boundary has been dedicated to this line, and overcommitment has mined projects instead.
Micromail and text messages are never a two-way street in the Internet Portal authentication, but rather a one-sided, real name compliance, which is based on the plan's layout and then how to put the login page.