Go to Main Contents

:: Industry developments

The WiFi network Portal certification system solves which real problem is the campus access.

Many schools decide to go to WiFi for WiFi. The room is not connected at night, the transport teacher was woken up by telephone and the log was turned half a day.

Your position:Home > Content Centre > Industry News > > Text

Many schools decide to go to wireless certification, often starting with a WiFi complaint. At night, the dormitory area is completely inaccessible, the transport teacher was woken by telephone, the logbook was turned half-dayly and it was not clear whether the authentication server was dead or full of access points, and the entire building’s network was reboot. The next day, the leadership asked which level of problems was missing.

It's not about being connected to WiFi.

Many schools think wireless certification is a card for people, but for most campuses WiFi is already open and the certification system addresses never access, but retroactive and manageable. No certifications in early years, who goes on the network or which equipment to use, can only be found, and nothing can be done.

The real problem is, the wired account and the actual man's tie.

The campus WiFi is most afraid of a full-scale account. When it does not, there is a single one in the dormitory, and anyone can be connected to it. There are no real cyber security incidents.

True question two: Continuous certification of roaming across points of access

The biggest difference between WiFi and the cable is that students walk from dormitory to building, then to library, through more than a dozen access points. If you replay the authentication page at every switch point, re-entry will be very bad. One of the values of wireless Portal is that one certification is valid within the legal range of roaming without repeated login. We have experienced early programs where we don't do roaming sessions, and students are kicked off each other, with complaints higher than before going online.

Real problem three: rapid positioning in case of failure

The certification log can tell you where the card is, whether the authentication server is not responding, the web-backing process is slow or the access point is full, without guessing. We have compared to the wireless Portal school, and the average time that network centres handle WiFi complaints has been reduced from an hour level to a minute level because the system directly marks down failure points. This function is usually no exaggeration, but it's lifesaving when one happens. Many schools only realize that the certification system means more than just a manager, and more so save their own time.

True question four: Compliance and audit

There are clear requirements for the retention of school wireless logs, which are hard indicators for long and retroactive periods. Manual logs are unrealistic and inaccurate, and Wireless Portal naturally produces them, as long as they have a retention strategy and backup, and report directly to the audit. We treat compliance as a hidden value of this system because it is usually invisible, but one day our superiors check it, it is the school's shield. If we do not want to be stuck with this problem, we need to keep the log clear before going online and then remediate it when we check.

Don't think of WiFi network Portal as a master.

It's not going to solve anything. Wireless Portal is about access and authentication, whether it filters content or optimized bandwidth or protection against viruses, but they are different systems. We have seen schools buy one at a price, expect them to block bad websites and fix Carton by the way, and find out exactly what they were expecting, and make a misunderstanding.

Order the questions before you choose.

The above questions are sorted according to the priorities of our schools, so that we know how much capacity we need to buy and whether to focus on roaming. The dormitories have a lot of equipment and come up with a lot of things, giving priority to terminal loads; complaints are slow-directed, log capabilities are given priority; compliance is high, retention strategies are given priority. When we do programs for schools, the first thing is that the network centres list lists the lists and line them up at the frequency of events.

In conclusion, a wireless certification system is perfectly feasible, but it must be understood what sort of problem it solves. The four most tangible are the ones that bind, roam, locate, and comply with. Sorting the problems ahead, you have a catch, you get on the line, you don't stop the fires. Many schools ask prices and skip the most important questions.

Access Program I'll be right back. Telephone counselling