So how the WiFi Authentication & Billing system reduces account sharing is a very real question.
And this can't be just about it.“Remind users not to share”The solution must be to use the rules of the system.
First, the most direct way to go isLimit TerminalsThis is almost the most basic layer of control. A single account allows several devices to be online at once, and must be set up before it does. If the system's default is not limited or too restrictive, the sharing problem will become more apparent.
But terminal limits cannot be very thick. The real useful network Wi Authentication & Billing system, not just one simple one.“A few pieces of equipment, tops.”If you do not, the normal user will be injured and then the sharing will be unstung, and there will be more complaints.
Second level control, yes.Terminal binding mechanism. The terminal limit is resolved by“We can do a few at the same time.”The terminal's fix is“Which equipment does this account use?”. If the system allows an account to be changed indefinitely, even if online numbers are very limited, it will not be able to press down on account sharing. Because several people can rotate, as long as they are not online at the same time and do not appear to be illegal, they actually share. So a more mature network WiFi Authentication & Billing usually limits not only the number of online terminals but also controls the frequency of terminal switching. For example, frequent replacements require recertification or manual processing after a short period of time, so that the cost of sharing is really raised.
Third floor, that's...Classify the package.Many projects control sharing, and they are not necessarily the best solution. Because some users do have normal multi-equipment needs, such as mobile plus computers, which are bad if completely unusable. More rationally, it is often possible to link the number of terminals with the level of the package. For example, basic packages allow one device, standard set allows two devices, advanced suites allow three devices.
There's another thing that can easily be ignored, and that's...Page Tips and User Education. Many sharing problems are growing more and more, not because users are particularly skilled, but because the rules of the system themselves are unclear. Users have no idea how they can bind a few devices or how to handle them when they change their equipment, let alone what will happen if they find the shares. The final rules are hidden in the backstage, there is nothing on the front desk, and users certainly try again, and it just makes the system look bad. So the real mature network Wi Authentication & Billing system should have a clear message from the front desk: The current package allows for several devices, what has been tied, how they are over-limited and what to do when they need to be unbound. The clearer the rules, the less the chaos is usually.
And deep down, account sharing is not just about the revenue, but it also has a direct impact.Network experienceA number of people share an account, often with a problem not in the back, but rather speed and stability. The original package was designed to be used by one person, and it was hung by more individuals, with confusion on the line, bandwidth being robbed, high frequency of switching, and ultimately poor experience for regular payers.“Make less money.”The problem is that the overall slogans are starting to decline. So, by nature, reducing account sharing is also protecting normal use experiences.
Many clients have previously felt that account sharing is a minor problem, starting with the charge. This judgment is very easy to lose. Because the WiFi Authentication & Billing system on the web will soon become user habit. If the rules are too loose, everyone is used to sharing and then back-tightening.
In another case, it is particularly common for the field manager to deliberately open up the terminal numbers because he himself fears that the rules will affect the renewal. In the short term, it seems as if users were more receptive; in the long run, sharing tends to be increasingly serious and real payments are less likely to rise. Because when a user finds out that an account can be used by many people, it will not buy more accounts at its own initiative. The true sure thing is not unlimited liberalization but leaving reasonable space for the user while keeping the bottom line. For example, normal dual equipment needs are allowed, but no ceilings are allowed to be shared; changes of equipment are permitted, but cut-off frequencies are restricted; high-level multi-end meals are allowed, but ordinary ones must be controlled. This would enable the system to manage sharing without putting too much pressure on normal user experience.
After all, the Wi Authentication & Billing system is not based on a word that reduces account sharing.“Disable sharing”The rules are working at the same time:
Terminal limit, control the number of online items;
Terminal binding, control of long-term equipment;
Switch frequency limit, to prevent rotation;
Classify the package., to convert normal multi-equipment requirements into reasonable charges;
Front desk tip and backstage management, clear the rules and operate manageable.
If all of these capabilities are available, account sharing problems usually run down half. Many fee-paying projects cannot be done at a later stage, not because no one needs the network, but because the system takes it too loose and eventually runs thin. The truly mature WiFi Authentication & Billing system is not just a collection of money; it can balance fees, end control and user experiences.