Go to Main Contents

:: Industry developments

What's the difference between the WiFi Natshell network and the ordinary WiFi system? Many projects were wrong from the beginning.

Many clients used to mix the WiFi Authentication & Billing system with normal WiFi management when they were in the consulting network. They thought there was a network on the site, and AP was installed.

Your position:Home > Content Centre > Industry News > > Text
A lot of clients are consulting.Network Wi Authentication & Billing SystemSometimes there is a mistake, that it mixes with the normal WiFi administration. It's felt that the site has a network of wires and APs, SSIDs can be sent and users connected. If you want to authenticate and charge, then just add another page to the original, or add a simple module. It's not as simple as that.

Because ordinary WiFi management, the focus is usually just...“To cover the network, access it, keep it running.”The core concerns are wireless signals, AP numbers, roaming effects, and coverage quality.Network Wi Authentication & Billing SystemThe solution is not to cover the problem; it really addresses another layer:Who has access to the Internet, how they can access it, how they charge for it, how many devices an account can use, how they stop after maturity, how they keep a log, how they check backstage and how they operate later.

Both appear to be connected to wireless networks, but not at all the same. The normal WiFi manages sub-level access and the network WiFi Authentication & Billing system controls and operates in a horizontal way. The former is more like fixing roads so that cars can run; the latter is more like setting rules at intersections, charging fees, laying access rights, and recording who passes by.

Many projects are wrong from the beginning, often here. There's already a basic wireless environment in the field and the client feels that“The network's all over.”The Authentication & Billing system should be a minor event. When the results are really met, it is only when it comes to finding that the old wireless environment may have been able to make basic access, limited support for external Portal, incomplete transmission of authentication results, poor synchronization of terminal status and less natural connection to fee logic. On the surface, there is just one additional certification page, and what is missing is the entire chain of authentication and billing.

So the most central difference between the WiFi Authentication & Billing system and ordinary WiFi management is not in the page, but in the web.Control capacityThe general WiFi administration is more concerned with user access, and the web-based WiFi Authentication & Billing system is more concerned with the whole set of rules that are up front and back. For example, whether staff and visitors are in the same process, whether students and teachers can separate themselves from each other, whether guests and temporary guests can be certified differently, and whether a single account allows several devices to be online at the same time, which is not what ordinary WiFi management will focus on.

And looking down, the difference is thatFee logicOrdinary WiFi administration usually does not assume the responsibility for charging fees, but is at most simple account control. It really involves running charges on time, by day, by month, by terminal, and it's already in the NATSHEL_AUTH_BILLING system. Especially in the context of dormitories, apartments, campus accommodation, training spaces, shared networks, the network itself is a long-term operation project, which makes it difficult to make a proper checkout of the fee rules, and the cost renewal process.

There's another particular difference, that's...Operation and transport pressureThe normal WiFi administration is more network-based, with daily coverage and equipment status and connection check problems. And the web WiFi Authentication & Billing system has a clear increase in management action. User authentication for anomalies, suite expiration, device untying, fee breakout, terminal overlimits, renewal recovery, online synchronisation, log review are all of these things that will happen day after NATSHEL_AUTH_BILLING system. If it is understood as an ordinary WiFi, later on, it will often be found to be totally inadequate and detailed.

So many projects have been poorly done at a later stage, not because the system is too complex, but because they are mispositioned from the beginning. By treating the WiFi Authentication & Billing system as a small patch for ordinary WiFi management, it will result in underestimating field requirements, underestimating the complexity of the links and underestimating the late operating workload. The real mature idea is to recognize from the outset that it is an independent on-site management system rather than a page function. It takes both the existing network environment and authentication logic, billing rules, terminal control and backstage operations.

After all, the ordinary WiFi management solves the problem.“Do you have a net?”The web-based WiFi Authentication & Billing system addresses the problem of the Internet.“How do we handle this network, how to collect it, how to leave a mark, how to run for long?”The two are not substitute relationships, but rather the top-down two. The wireless base on the ground is doing well, and if the upper rules are broken, it will be messy. What really does things go smoothly is not mix them up, but then separates the basic wireless access from the upper NATSHEL_AUTH_BILLING and then finally combines them.

Access Program I'll be right back. Telephone counselling