And because of the ever-increasing demand, hotels and parks have placed a lot more emphasis on Wifi's real name certification system than they used to be. It's not that you suddenly started to focus on one.“Authentication Page”The fact that the site management is becoming more complex and that it was already difficult to sustain real operational needs by simply making web-based access.
The hotel is, on the surface, a little bit less complicated than it seems. But the opposite is true. Hotels are connected to the Internet, with very frequent movements and mixed identity structures. Hotels are one type of guest, hotel staff are one category, temporary visitors are one category, external service personnel are another, and conference guests are another. High Star hotels, foreign hotels, chains, large hotels, and more complex certification requirements.
The hotel has become more interested in Wifi's real name certification system, the first level of which is that people are complex and can't mix. Residents often want to be simple, better connected to one another, without wishing to do too much. Hotel workers have a more internal management logic than they need to be able to do with their own identity, department authority, office network. Foreign visitors are another logic, often just temporary access, not to be mixed with their guests or employees. You will find that hotels cannot be made available to anyone but to everyone.“We'll use the same way to access the Internet.”。
So a real-land Wifi real name certification system, first to be solved in the hotel scene, is a problem of different groups of people who have to separate their names. Residents can take room numbers and cell numbers, names and names, or combinations of names and identities and passports; employees can use account codes, work numbers or business identification; and guests and temporary visitors can go through SMS, micromail authentication, temporary vouchers, etc. If the system is unable to achieve this level, it can only do a single window page, and the real management capacity required by the hotel has not been built up.
Apart from the complexity of the crowd, the hotel values the Wifi system for real names, and there is a very realistic reason why it is foreign-related and compliance requirements. Especially hotels with guest capabilities are often more sensitive to identification, log retention, access to records.“We'll talk on the Internet.”The small thing is that the project must be taken into account at first. Many hotels have a pre-life experience of seeing WiFi as part of their service, and they feel connected, and when they come up with compliance checks or log back to check out the need for it, they find that the original scheme is too light to sustain any follow-up requirements.
If the WiFi certification process is too cumbersome, the page jumps again, the code doesn't come up, or it does not go online, the first impression of a hotel is bad. Especially high-rise hotels, big conference hotels, tourist season scenes, and more terminals, the system stability problem is much greater.“The butler.”It is also intended to make the process of access easier for residents, to improve back-office management and to avoid repeated online complaints being handled by the front desk and the Ministry of Engineering.
This is why many hotels are not satisfied with the simple Portal page. It's good that the pages come out of it, not just the experience. What really affects the experience is whether the authentication method is reasonable, whether the information on the occupants can be matched well, whether the page opens quickly and at a steady peak, whether the guests need to repeat their certifications and if they have normal access after changing equipment. These problems ultimately lie in the design capacity of the Wifi real name certification system itself, rather than in the view of a page.
In the hotel scene, there is a growing tendency for many hotels to want certification systems and their own operating systems to be combined rather than isolated. For example, residents automatically get access rights when they are in, leaving them automatically. For example, different types of housing, different regions can correspond to different Internet strategies; for example, Portal pages display brand messages, service portals, multilingual descriptions; and for example, conglomerates hotels want multiple shops to have uniform certification strategies and consistent log retention methods. The more you do it, the more you find a mature Wifi real name certification system.“Online authentication tool”And it's a very basic layer of hotel digital services experience.
The landscape is different but not less complex. The campus is not as high-frequency as a hotel to replace residents, and the structure of the campus is as complicated.
The problem is growing when the campus size comes up. Fixed office staff have to be able to stay steady for a long time, preferably without frequent swings after certification; visitors should go on temporary certification, access control and limitation; construction and outsourcing personnel are sometimes separate and cannot be processed directly by visitors or equivalent to regular employees. Without a Wifi physical name certification system to break up these people, the campus wireless network surfaces are functional and backstages are increasingly chaotic.
And campuses and hotels are different, and the park is usually more sensitive to segregation of privileges. Many parks are not single office areas, but multi-houses, multi-enterprises, multifunctional zones. Some areas are open only to in-house staff, others can be accessible to visitors, or even a network that distinguishes between office networks, visitor networks, and feeder networks.
The park has focused on the Wifi physical name certification system, and this is also due to the increasing regulation of visitors ' management. Many campuses previously had low demand for wireless visitor networks, either passwords or verbally speaking how they were connected. This approach is becoming increasingly inappropriate. It is simple because when there are large numbers of visitors, frequent traffic, multi-building, high demand for campus services, it is neither well managed nor easy to return passwords orally. Many parks prefer that visitors be connected by text message authentication, micromail authentication, front desk clearance, appointment linkage so that the back office knows who comes, when and what kind of privileges they have. For the manager, it's not just convenience. It's a park network that really comes from“Anyone can connect.”Changed“Who's in the company, how? What can you do when you're in the company?”The blogger says that the government is not sure what it means to see more clearly.
In a deeper sense, the Wifi physical identification system in the park landscape is also of practical value: it combines management. Many parks are not single points but long-term co-exist with multiple buildings, regions, and enterprises. Without uniform certification and unified management capabilities, it will be difficult to maintain the network back. One regional approach, one building, one set of rules that looks all right on the surface, actually makes transportation more difficult. A truly mature Wifi real name certification system that integrates multiple regions, multiple SSIDs, multiple authentication methods into one set of backstages, uniform marks and unified strategy management will be much less costly to follow, whether it is extended to areas, firms, rules for visiting visitors, log checks, and verification records.
The two types of scenes, hotel and park, are different, but there is a growing interest in the Wifi real name certification system. The bottom logic is the same. It's not just about making people feel like they're doing it.“It's authenticated and then online.”Instead, field management has become more complex, with a lot of personnel and experience becoming more demanding, and with more detailed footprints and compliance requirements. The old approach to using only one Portal page, a unified password, and a simple authentication code has proved difficult to meet the real needs of the present.
So why is the hotel and park paying increasing attention to Wifi physical identification, not because it is new in itself, but because both types of scenes no longer allow for rough Internet access management? Hotels need to have a guest experience, outsider certification, staff visitor diversion, logs to check; campuses need steady access, visitors are controlled release, regional privileges are isolated, back-office management is unified. As long as field demand comes this far, the Wifi physical accreditation system will no longer be an optional small module, but will become a critical part of the entire wireless network management.