The real project is a site where people are never the same. A visitor is a permanent resident, and a temporary visitor is another. Hotel guests, campus employees, out-of-house construction workers, conference guests, who are connected to the same network, but the certification logic usually doesn’t. If a Wifi real name system gives everyone a single page, one cell phone number is done, it's really very limited.
Many businesses, schools, parks are still in a position to do so. For simple reasons, the account code is the most secure and controlled. Employees can log in directly with their work numbers, school numbers, internal accounts, and backstages easily connect to existing systems.“Accessible”It's a better access. Whoever has access to the Internet, who can only access it, who can do it for long and who can access it in some areas, is easier to do. Especially business office scenes, often not.“Anyone can be connected.”Instead, the staff network and the visitors' network must be distinguished, and account certification is the most reliable.
This is also appropriate for linking existing systems. For example, the units have OA accounts, AD domain accounts, engineering systems, teaching staff accounts, student accounts, and it would be easier to get a live deployment if the Wifi physical name certification system could call them directly. The employees do not re-record an account, nor do managers repeat a new set of accounts, grouping or authorization. Many projects are not used late in their time, but rather cut apart the system. Users need to re-register and re-letter the passwords for as long as they can.
SMS certification has been common throughout the years, especially in the context of visitor networks, public area networks, hotels, apartments, venues and temporary events. For real reasons, visitors cannot have internal accounts or be comfortable with a manual account at the front desk, which is natural. Users enter cell phone numbers, receive authentication codes, and then access the Internet to the entire process.
The SMS authentication is not the end of the interface. In real projects, many details affect experience. Delays in sending the code are high, whether repeated requests will stop, whether the number needs black and white list control, how long it takes to access the Internet after certification, and whether it supports a limited terminal number for the same cell number are part of system capability. Some items go further, require SMS certification only for visitors, and staff cannot follow this path; some projects require front desk approval before triggering SMS authentication; others require SMS certification and combination checks for later ID numbers, room numbers, names. So, text-messaging looks simple. It really works well. It's a big difference.
Micro-letter authentication is also a very popular form of customer scrutiny. In particular, when it comes to visitors’ networks, business places, hotels, exhibitions, and event venues, many people want users to clean or click micro-mails to access them, which is a low threshold and easy experience. For some brand parties, the additional value of micro-credit certification is that Portal pages can be shown themselves.
But the micro-credit certification is not understood too easily.“Micromail Authentication”Some require quick access, some require micro-certificate and then a cell number. Others require micro-certifier to be used only as the first step, others require that the certifier be linked to visitors' approval, or that it be used only in the visitor network and not have access to the office network. That is, whether the certifier is just one of the ways, the key or the backstage rules are matched. If Wifi authenticated authentication system is simply a simple micro-bending operation, it looks like it has a function and actually has a few hits.“Show Functions”。
Visitors' accreditation is another point that cannot be seen alone. Many clients say they want to do it, and not just one.“Visitors can access the Internet.”The needs are common in the enterprise’s office buildings, government offices, parks, banks, hospitals, and schools. Visitors’ networks are generally more controlled, and successful certification may only be made available to the extranet or only within a specified time frame or area.
So what you really want to see is not just support for non-support, but rather detail. Can we make a temporary account, get the front desk open, get clearance cleared, get text messages + visitor registration, be automatic by day, hour or session, and limit one person to more than one flight? These are all field functions. Many of the so-called wifi authentication systems, which say that supporting a visitor's certification is actually supported by an additional cell phone entry, do not allow real visitors management.
Business micro-credit, nailing, and other types of business identification are becoming more common. Especially in the office landscape, many units tend to have their employees directly connected to the company's micro-identity instead of re-recording a wireless network account. The best benefit is that the employee status is naturally linked to the enterprise's internal organizational structure. Who in what sector, who can go on which network, who can only visit SSID, and who will be able to do it, will be easier to distinguish between backstage.“Make it easier.”It is about making the Internet authenticated and internal identity systems truly compatible.
Of course, it is a prerequisite that the Wifi physical name certification system itself has sufficient docking capacity. It's not about supporting the enterprise's micro-letters, but about actually running the project. Depending on how the authentication results are forwarded, how users group, how the checkout account is handled, how the permission strategy follows the identity and whether in unusual cases you can cut back the backup authentication. Only those who have done the projects will think ahead of them. Otherwise many systems have good functional tables, they turn into real live ones.“Theoretical support”。
In hotels, apartments, and reception venues abroad, combinations are often used. For example, the number of a house plus cell phone, the name plus the name, the number after the house plus the identity card, and even the passport number behind it. These scenes are not managed by employees, but rather have residential identification and compliance marks at their core. The hotel is more concerned with the user's willingness to operate than with the background identification of who this person is, whether he is a tenant or not, and whether the log can be checked up and back.
The school landscape is different. The school ' s wifi system for authenticating names often requires a sign, a uniform identity, text-text certification and visitor accreditation. Some students go to school, some teachers go to work, some visitors are allowed to use only in office or public areas, and some dormitories network add extra fees and terminal limits. You can see that the certification methods are not much, never the focus, but the system ' s focus is whether they can be truly combined and rules do not fight.
From a project perspective, a practical Wifi real name certification system would be better developed“Some kind of certification is a special thing.”But...“Various authentication methods can exist simultaneously and rules are clear.”The system is now online, with a lot of space to expand. It looks like more preparation and later savings.
One thing that is easily overlooked is that authentication methods and terminal management are compatible. Many clients ask what forms of certification they support, and actually continue to ask: Can one person be restricted? Can a single account be limited to a few devices at the same time? Do you want to re-accredited after a mobile phone change? Permanent users can avoid repeating authentication? These issues appear like end management, which is tied up with certification. Because if the system only supports authentication and does not support terminal strategies, it is very confusing.
So, the question of which authentication methods are supported by the Wifi real name certification system is not just a list of functions. The functional table says that it supports account codes, text messages, micro-mails, visitors, and business micro-letters. It really depends on whether these authentication methods are used in separate settings, people-to-people use, access to existing systems, permission management, log retention, terminal restrictions. In the end, authentication is not done in aggregate numbers but in ways that solve problems in the field.
Many projects are not working because there are few, but because the authentication methods look so many and they actually are isolated. The staff set, the visitors' set, the backstages, the logs are incomplete, and it is necessary to re-establish a new scene. Only then will the real Wifi authenticated system of physical name certification be able to put its employees in the same management logic, with different people taking different entrances.“It's a way to get people online.”But it is truly sustainable, stable and backward.