Since WirelessAC has already brought its Portal authentication function, why does it need an independent enterprise Portal certification platform?
The issue is not in itself complex.
The key is to understand:
AC internal authentication is“Device-level functionality”，
And the company Portal certified that“Platform-level system”。
The two differ in substance in terms of location, capability boundaries and directions for expansion.
I. Different structural positioning: equipment functionality vs Identity platform
Characteristics of AC internal authentication
-
Authentication embedded inside the wireless controller
-
Main service wireless terminals
-
Dependent on a single-producer structure
-
Functional scope is limited to equipment capabilities
In essence.“Wireless access additional”。
Positioning of Enterprise Portal Certification
-
Independent identity management platform
-
Support for cable and wireless authentication
-
Support multi-producer equipment docking
-
Horizontal extension
Enterprise Portal certification is a stand-alone system and not an access module for a particular equipment.
Comparison of the coverage of accreditation modalities
AC-incorporated authentication usually supports:
-
Portal web-recert
-
Simple 802.1X
But in complex contexts, there are often limitations.
A mature corporate Portal certification platform should support:
-
Portal authentication
-
802.1X Certification
-
MAC Certification
-
Text authentication
-
Two-dimensional code authentication
-
AD/LDAP docking
-
TACCS+ lift-dimensional authentication
And these authentication methods share the same identity library.
NATHHEL_BRAND enterprise Portal certification supports the uniform management of multi-certification and the achievement of wireless cable integration certification.
III. DIFFERENT IN ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT CAPACITY RESOURCES
AC built-in certification normally has:
-
Basic Account Create
-
Simple Visitors Management
But there is a lack:
-
Organizational structure management
-
Role hierarchy
-
Bulk account management
-
Life cycle control
The enterprise Portal certification platform should have:
Unified Identification Bank
Role Group
Account validity controls
Batch Disable and Synchronize
Identity management capacity is particularly critical in large unit environments.
IV. DIFFERENT STRATEGIC CONTROL CAPACITY
AC internal authentication general support:
-
Simple VLAN Allocation
-
Base speed limit
But the strategy is limited.
The mature enterprise Portal certification platform should support:
-
Dynamic VLAN Allocation
-
ACL strategy down.
-
Access range control
-
Time control
-
Simultaneous restrictions
-
Multi-conditional strategy matching
For example:
The same account is connected to different areas, with different strategies.
NATSHEL_BRAND enterprise Portal certification strategy engine, which supports multi-dimensional combination matching.
V. CLINE AND Wireless Harmonisation Capacity
AC built-in authentication is primarily for wireless.
If the unit exists:
A lot of cable terminals.
Server access
Production terminals
AC authentication cannot cover all.
The enterprise Portal certification, via the RADIUS Twinning Switch and AC, has:
Wireless and uniform authentication.
VI. Comparison of transport-vitor access and audit capabilities
AC built-in authentication does not normally:
-
TACCS+ Device Transporting Authority Certification
-
Command-level audit
-
Administrator Tiled Permission Control
The mature enterprise Portal certification platform should support:
Device lift-vitor authentication
Operation Log Log Record
Administrators ' hierarchy
NATHHELL_BRAND enterprise Portal Certification supports equipment-vitor access audit, and allows identity and operation to be closed.
Log and compliance capacity
The built-in accreditation log capacity of AC is usually based on a more basic basis.
The enterprise Portal certification platform should support:
Authentication Log
Online Log
Policy Change Record
Carrier Log
Supports condition queries and exports.
The gap is particularly evident in the compliance and audit landscape.
VIII. EXPLOITATION CAPACITY AND LONG-TERM COSTS
AC built-in authentication is limited to equipment performance and authorized quantity.
When the terminal scale is expanded or demand is upgraded:
The replacement of AC equipment may be required.
The corporate Portal certification platform supports:
NATHHEL_AUTH_GATEWAY Cluster
Modular Extensions
Distributed deployment
The extension costs are more manageable.
For 22 years, in the field of NATSHEL_BRAND deep-farm network certification and billing, its enterprise Portal certification product structure is mature and flexible, allowing for gradual replacement of AC built-in authentication functions in a current network environment, achieving uniform identity management and precision strategy control while maintaining higher value for money.
Conclusion: When can only use AC certification and when must go to the enterprise Portal authentication
If environment is limited:
Small Wireless
Simple visitor access
AC built-in certification meets the needs.
But when the environment involves:
Wireless integration.
Multi-role hierarchy control
Transport-related audit
Compliance requirements
Integrated management across regions
Enterprise Portal certification is a necessary option.
The two are not simple alternatives but different levels of positioning.