The following is explained in two main lines:
First, why are operators pressing for a sub-division?
Secondly, why must the school require a sub-alternation?
i. For operators: the sub-design directly determines "opening rate, authenticity of performance and ceiling on size"
One million. Substitutes are essentially...“Systematization of operator opening capacity”
In the school scene, operators do not face students directly but throughCampus network billing operatorIndirectly completing user opening, billing and retention.
In the absence of a sub-division, it is often:
-
Students pay through third parties
-
The network is...“It's working.”But...The operator's account dial is not actually completed
-
The operator's backstage saw this.“Bandwidth is in use. Users are not online.”
What does that mean for the operator?
-
Number of open accounts is uncontrollable
-
User conversion chain break
-
The size of the campus user cannot be counted against real performance
And...The existence of a sub-dealing mechanism is essentially:
As long as the student is able to access the Internet = a dial-up operation on the operator side will be completed
This makes:
-
Every user paying for the fee corresponds to the real operator account.
-
Every online behavior is counted into the operator's statistical caliber.
-
The user on campus is no longer a“Black Box Flows”, but standard on the web
2 ⁇ Without sub-division, campus projects are difficult to obtain long-term endorsement from operators
In practical cooperation, the operator is most concerned about three things:
-
Costing system“Surrounding the operator.”
-
User size is invisible
-
The later audit was not right.
Without a system of sub-design, there are often:
-
There are a lot of users on the side of the school.
-
Low number of operators on the web
-
Flow consumption does not match account number
The end result is usually:
-
Operators reduce bandwidth support
-
Elimination of preferential settlements
-
Even requiring a re-engineering or re-entry of the project
And...Authentication & Billing System for Campus with dialysis CapacityThis problem was solved from the outset:
-
Dial account is clear.
-
Online behavior and account number
-
Operators can check, check, and count at any time.
That's why.Now, the operator has clearly requested it before bidding or cooperating on a campus project.“We must support the dial.”。
II. FOR SCHOOL: APPOINTMENT“Core regulatory tools for network billing operators”
From a school perspective, the point of concern is not“Substitute technology”But:
Money, users, risk manageable
One. No sub-division. School size for real users is...“Blindness”It's...
If the system does not substitute, common problems include:
-
The school can only see:
-
How many accounts are there in the system?
-
How much did you charge?
-
-
But I can't see:
-
Is the Internet actually real?
-
Is there a false account number, an internal test account number?
-
Is there a problem?“Few but huge.”I'm sorry.
-
And once connected to the operator, dial:
-
Every user with Internet access corresponds to a real operator account.
-
Schools can be conducted through operator-side dataCross-check
-
User size, online activity, inaccessibility“System-based forgery”
For the school, the essence is:
I added one to the network billing operator.“External non-defeating regulatory dimensions”
2 % of the total number of students in the school system“Regulate rather than participate in operations”Capacity
The real position of schools is usually:
-
The network can be marketed.
-
But...Responsibility cannot be outsourced
-
Schools are the first responsible parties when complaints, audits and accountability arise
Under the sub-dealing mechanism, schools can:
-
No participation in specific fee details
-
Do not directly manage student accounts
-
But it can:
-
View the real user size on the web
-
Check operator dial-up data
-
To determine whether the system is operating abnormally.
-
This makes schools face:
-
Student complaints
-
Higher audit
-
Cyber security check.
Sometimes, there is.Clear, traceable and third-party verifiable data support。
III. WHY Authentication & Billing ON SCHOOL NETWORKS
This is a problem that you have repeatedly stressed before, but many manufacturers deliberately avoid.
⁇. A common problem with late-singling
-
The dialled logic is on the gateway level, and the billing logic is on the system level.
-
Account status is not synchronised
-
Dialing failure and authentication failure
-
The peak period is a very high-intensity triggering the centralized breakout.
The core advantages of the original design
In the mature campus network Authentication & Billing system, dialling should:
-
BecomeA piece of the billing engine.
-
Decoupling with authentication status, online state, and debugging state
-
Support:
-
Auto Switching Failed Dial
-
The dialup is not broken.
-
Pool of accounts, unified schedule
-
That is why you have repeatedly stressed:
The sub-dealing is not a function point, but rather a system architecture capability.
The sub-allocation in the campus network Authentication & Billing system is not for Internet access, but for every user who has access to it to become a real user that can be seen by operators, managed by schools and cannot be faked by the system.