Many campus networks, Authentication & Billing systems were originally designed not without considering multi-school areas but ratherThe erosion of the system's structure in long-term operation is underestimated.。
Almost all those who actually run through more than three years of multi-school projects go through a process:
From“Locally Controlable” → “Partial Split” → “Harmonized recovery”。
And the final drop point is often one:The cloud-based unified campus network Authentication & Billing system.
Not about trends, but why.“The results of the run-out.”。
The first thing that many campuses hit is not performance, but...“State boundary”
In the context of a single campus, design deficiencies in many campus networks NATSHEL_AUTH_BILLING systems were concealed:
-
Could not close temporary folder: %s
-
The billing session is maintained by the campus itself.
-
The strategy rules are in effect by the campus.
When these designs operate in single campuses, the problem is not obvious becauseNatural concentration。
Once it's in multi-school environments, the first round of shocks is not a parallel but rather a combination.The state boundary is broken.：
-
Students' cross-school activities become normal.
-
Teachers switch access to different campuses
-
Inconsistencies in network structures between campuses
If the campus network Authentication & Billing system still has to be used“School complex”For logical boundaries, multiple versions will quickly appear within the system.“Same guy.”：
-
One user, multiple authentication status
-
A billing cycle, multiple sessions
-
A strategy, multiple implementation outcomes
The problem is thatIt can't be solved by adding equipment, it can only be resolved by closing state.。
II. Multi-school districts are operating until the second year, and manualization begins to become part of the system
Multi-school projects are usually run from 6 to 12 months ago.“Looks okay.”The real turning point often occurs in the second year:
-
School area expansion
-
Policy Adjustments
-
Detailed rules for costing
If the campus network Authentication & Billing system is not a cloud-based unified structure, the transport dimension will evolve into:
-
The strategy needs to be synchronized across campuses.
-
The billing anomaly requires manual matching.
-
Certification issues rely on empirical documentation
The system itself is no longer a complete product, but rather becomes:
System + Combination of manual patches。
This is why the multi-school project has reached a late stage, and it is evident to schools and integrated agents that:
People are getting busy, but the problem is not decreasing.
The cloud-based unified campus network Authentication & Billing system is essentially doing one thing:
Take it.“The logic of a man's mind.”Repossession of the system.
III. The local structure began to lose after multiple campuses were added up“Batch capacity”
In multi-school environments, composts are not simple additions, but ratherPeak Error superposition：
-
A. The campus's late peak
-
B School district examination week
-
C. Focus of campus activities
If the campus network Authentication & Billing system has a billing engine and certification engine scattered locally in each school district:
-
Peaks cannot be smoothed
-
The school can't absorb the pressure.
-
Single-point anomalies are more likely to be magnified.
Many projects are tried at this time:
-
To a school district alone.
-
I'm adding equipment to an export.
But this only further exacerbates the problem of structural inconsistencies.
The cloud-based integrated campus network Authentication & Billing system, which can combine multi-school areasConsider a whole loadInstead of multiple isolated peaks, stress is absorbed at the systemic level rather than hard-resistant by splitting.
The number of students in the school system is estimated at around 5%.“Cost consistency”Started becoming a core contradiction.
The three years or so of operation in multi-school districts are really frequently discussed, often:
-
Why is the same set of meals not in the same way as in different campuses?
-
Why does the reconciliation get more complicated?
-
Why does it explain the cost of it getting higher and higher?
Such issues are not essentially questions of fee-based rules, but rather:
Whether the billing state is global or not.
As long as the campus network Authentication & Billing has multiple examples and multiple status sources,
-
The reconciliation must be manual.
-
I'm sure you can't say anything about it.
-
The risk will accumulate.
The cloud is not united.“Centralized management”In addition, it is intended to ensure:
One user, under any campus, under any exit, has only one fee.
V. Localization will in turn limit development when multiple campuses are expanded to a certain size
Many colleges tend to be in the early multi-school phase.“School district autonomy”, but when the scale is further expanded, it will be found that:
-
The new campus is getting longer and longer online.
-
The old school is not moving.
-
The system's almost out of date.
The reason is not complicated:
The system has been locked in multiple local logic sets.
The cloud-based unified campus network Authentication & Billing system has demonstrated its advantages at this stage:
-
The new campus is just a new access point.
-
No need to copy complete logic
-
Not affecting the existing active campus.
This gives the system room to evolve over time, not in multi-school structures.“Solid”。
VI. Return to nature: Multi-schooling is not a technical issue, but a product design choice
Almost all the multi-school projects that eventually returned to cloudy reunification are not going.“Ideal route.”But...And it's been pushed by reality.：
-
The state cannot be dispersed for long.
-
The cost of labour cannot be added indefinitely.
-
Risks cannot be absorbed by experience.
One of the product judgements that NatShell maintains in the long-term university project is:
The campus network Authentication & Billing system is not designed for a year to run, but for five-year, eight-year or even longer cycles.
When the time dimension is stretched, the multi-school project will eventually come to the same conclusion:
Only cloud unity will make the system truly run long, steady and less.