The WiFi authenticated was also deployed, and feedback from different projects in public security inspections is quite different.
Some projects are passed once, others are modified repeatedly, and one of the key points that is mentioned repeatedly but often ignored is that——
Whether WiFi authenticated is actually deployed in network export locations.
In the 21-year experience of NATSHEL_BRAND WiFi, one can clearly conclude:
From the perspective of public security inspections, the export control WiFi real name certification is the most clear, direct and readily accepted form of technology.
I. Public security inspection WiFi authenticated, first look“Where's the control point?”
When checking WiFi's actual name certification, the public security force does not look at how many systems and equipment you use but rather is very realistic about one issue:
If you don't get a real name, can this man be online?
Behind this sentence, the implicit logic of examination is:
-
Authentication results are authentic
-
Enforcement
-
Is there any space bypassing?
And all of these issues will eventually return to a technical point:
WiFi's actual name certification does not really control network exports.
II. WHAT IS“Export control WiFi authenticated”
Export control WiFi authenticated not a product but a productDeployment logic：
-
Flow of Internet access for all users
-
Must pass through the export node where WiFi authenticated.
-
Without certification, export is blocked directly
Common ways of achieving this include:
-
NATHHELL_AUTH_GATEWAY Deployed under the main router or main switch
-
Export flows are uniformly released through certified equipment
-
By-pass deployment but with physical flow control capability
Whatever form it takes, it is one thing:
Whether the export is controlled by the WiFi real name certification system.
III. WHY PUSH REFERENCE IN NATURE“Export control WiFi authenticated”
From a public security perspective, the export control WiFi real name certification has several natural advantages.
1 x not available“It's certified, but it's online.”♪ The gray space ♪
If WiFi authenticated only exists:
-
Portal Page
-
Frontend authentication process
-
Unenforceable systems
Then technically, there is always a risk of bypassing.
The export control WiFi authenticated means:
-
Uncertified = not available
-
Authentication failed = unable to get out of the network
-
Authentication expired = immediate offline
This logic is for the public security.I understand it at first sight, and I'm the easiest to accept.。
2 x net logs are naturally complete and not dependent“Tonic”
In checking WiFi's authenticated name, the public security is very concerned about the integrity of the log, including:
-
Who's at what time?
-
With what equipment?
-
Visited the network
Export control WiFi authenticated log from real flow entry point:
-
Not a push.
-
Not an estimate.
-
Not a recoup.
It's...Original records of every real Internet activity。
Such logs are the least risky when accessing, verifying and retroactive.
3- Clear lines of responsibility, avoid“The system is going to be a little bit different.”
In the case of a non-export control WiFi real name certification project, common disputes include:
-
Yeah, ace, it didn't stop.
-
Yes, Portal. No jump.
-
It's the log system that hasn't been synchronized.
The border between the liability of the WiFi authenticated export control type is clear:
-
Flows through exports
-
Export controlled by the certification system
-
The certification system is responsible for compliance
It means to the public security.Low cost of inspection and low communication costs。
Why do many of the restructuring projects end up in the same situation?“Return to export programmes”
In the process of practical adaptation, NATSHEL_BRAND has often encountered such situations:
-
Initial introduction of frontend authentication
-
Requesting a post at check
-
Reciprocal adjustment still falls short of the target
-
Eventually converted to export control WiFi real name certification
The reason is not complicated:
Public security does not want to understand your complex structure, but only to see the outcome of certainty.
The export control WiFi authenticated was one of the most definite results.
V. Small hotels and apartments, export control WiFi real name certification is almost the only solution
In small hotels, hotels and apartments the network is widespread:
-
AC
-
Equipment brands
-
Structure uncontrollable
At this point, if the export control WiFi authenticated:
-
Difficulties in ensuring mandatory certification
-
Log Source Unstable
-
The risk of inspection is very high.
The deployment of a WiFi physical-name audit gateway to the exit site is:
-
The technology is the easiest.
-
Compliance path is shortest
-
Minimum follow-up maintenance
VI. Export control WiFi authenticated not to be excluded“System docking”
It should be emphasized that:
Export control WiFi authenticated, not equal to“No docking system.”。
In the NATSHEL_BRAND programme:
-
Authentication Gateway Control and Audit
-
Backend WiFi live name authentication system for strategy, user, log
-
Access to PMS, apartment system, SMS platform, public security interface
Export control is...“It doesn't work.”，
The system's managed“Who's it for? How long?”。
VII. Priority ranking of WiFi authenticated from the point of view of public security inspection
From the experience of actual inspections, the implicit priority for public security certification of WiFi ' s real name is often:
-
Whether or not to control exports
-
Is it traceable to people?
-
Log Completeness
-
Reasonableness of authentication
Instead:
-
How's the page?
-
How many functions?
-
How complex is the system architecture?
The export control WiFi authenticated hit the first two key indicators.
VIII. WiFi authenticated“Export controls”The essence is to reduce uncertainty.
For operators, WiFi real name certification is not a sorting but a risk management tool.
The value of the export control WiFi authenticated is:
-
Risk pre-position
-
Results confirmed
-
Compliance is predictable
This is why, in an environment of continuous and intensified supervision by public security, a growing number of projects eventually choose this path.