Go to Main Contents

:: Industry developments

Campus network Authentication & Billing: Integrated Management of Location, Structure and Cross-Schools

When the campus is up, the key issue for Authentication & Billing is not functionality, but where it's in place, how it goes, how many campuses are managed together, how export networks are connected.

Your position:Home > Content Centre > Industry News > > Text
When the campus is up, the key issue for Authentication & Billing is no longer functionality, but rather...Where the system is, how the flow goes, how many campuses are managed together, how the export network connects operators.。

FromOverall architecture perspectiveComplete dismantling of the deployment of a mature campus network Authentication & Billing system.


I. What exactly should the NATHHELL_AUTH_BILLING system be deployed to the network?

The campus network Authentication & Billing system in the real university networkYou can't just find a server.。

A stable deployment location must meet three points simultaneously:

  • You can see the real flow of users.

  • Do Not become a Internet Bottle

  • Without compromising core transmission stability

1 Main deployment location: between exports and convergence

Most of the higher education institutions, Authentication & Billing systems are usually deployed at:

  • Before the campus network exits,

  • Or between the core exchange and export gateways.

  • Access by bypass or serial

The benefits of this are:

  • All traffic that requires authentication, billing and accurate identification.

  • No net forward capacity to affect core exchange

  • The network still has a controlled downgrade when the system is abnormal

2 ⁇ Difference in the deployment of accommodation and wireless scenes

In the dormitory wireless scene, it is common practice to:

  • AP → Gather → Core → NATHHELL_AUTH_BILLING System → Exports

  • NATHHELL_AUTH_BILLING System Unified Processing Hostel Users

  • Teaching, office traffic can be done by strategy.

This approach would facilitate:

  • Exact control accommodation billing

  • Without affecting the stability of teaching and office networks


II. WHY MAKING SYSTEMS VERY PROMOTING TO BE AROUND THE CURRENT OVERSIGHT

Many universities will deploy the campus network Authentication & Billing system in local office rooms at an early stage.
But as the scale increases,Cloud deployment is becoming the mainstream choice.The core reason is not“New Tide”But...Stability and transport costs。

1 cloud deployment is not about performance, but reliability

In real operations, cloud deployments are mainly addressed by:

  • Single point failure risk

  • Local engine room power, environmental issues

  • Aging and maintenance costs of hardware

NATHHELL_AUTH_BILLING is not a compulsive system, butExtremely dependent on continuous steady operation。

Cloud deployment can:

  • Multiple Nodes Redundancy

  • Quick down switch

  • Trans-geographical response

This is particularly important for the long-run campus network NATSHEL_AUTH_BILLING system.


2 ⁇ Cloud ≠ All traffic is cloudy.

The mature campus network Authentication & Billing system is usedClouds on the control surface, data localStructure:

  • Authentication, billing, strategy control on cloud end

  • Actual user traffic is still being transmitted locally

  • The clouds don't become a traffic bottle.

Such a structure would guarantee system stability without sacrificing performance.

This stratification, balancing stability and efficiency, is being used in the design of NATSHEL_AUTH_BILLING on campus network.


III. The core of integrated multi-school administration, not“- Get in line.”But...“I can handle it.”

The real challenge for educational groups or multi-school colleges is not network, but management.

1 Base premises for integrated multi-school area management

The mature campus network Authentication & Billing system must, in the multi-school landscape:

  • A unified Authentication & Billing platform

  • Multi-school strategy centralization

  • Centralized storage and analysis of data

At the same time, however, support:

  • School-level strategy differences

  • Independent exports and link conditions


2 x Common multi-school deployment pattern

The typical structure is as follows:

  • Cloudy Authentication & Billing Centre

  • Local access devices for schools

  • Strategy is sent out. Status implemented locally.

This would enable:

  • User-wide campus Seamless Authentication

  • Harmonization of the rules on costing

  • Data concentration statistics

It does not affect the global system because of a school district link problem.


How the inter-school Seamless Authentication is actually realized

So-called“No sense of it.”Not without authentication, but...Authentication does not interrupt the experience。

In multi-school environments, Seamless Authentication usually relies on:

  • Unified identity system (symbol / work number / cell phone number, etc.)

  • Unified account database

  • Session status is consistent with cloud

When users access different campuses:

  • System rapid identification

  • Auto Match Original Permissions

  • No need to repeat authentication information

This capacity is particularly critical for cross-school teaching, hands-on training and rotation.


V. The real way of being implemented by operators on the campus network

In many colleges, export networks are not simple.“A broadband.”。

Common scenes include:

  • Multi-operator exports

  • Hostel line billing

  • Different users go different exits

1 ⁇ What's a operator dialling?

Operators' referrals are essentially:

  • Completion of user certification on campus web side

  • Launch operator dialling by Authentication & Billing

  • Export accounts are managed centrally by the system

This would enable:

  • Multi-user shared export resources

  • Harmonized billing and strategic control

  • Avoid manual maintenance of large number dial accounts


2 ⁇ Synergy between the transfer and the system of costing

A mature campus network Authentication & Billing system, which usually includes the following:

  • User-lined dialling

  • Users release resources

  • The billing state is strongly associated with dial-up status

The system will not appear:

  • Users are offline but dialing is still in use

  • Or dialing interrupted but the bill continues.

It's a lot of systems.“Looks like it's a good proxy. It's not working.”Fundamental differences.


VI. The ultimate goal of the overall architecture: stability, concentration, scalability

From a holistic deployment perspective, the complex nature of the Authentication & Billing system, which ultimately seeks not to be complicated but rather:

  • Clear structure

  • Clear lines of responsibility

  • Easily expanded, easily maintained

  • It's not going to work for long.

NATHHEL_BRAND, IN THE PRACTICE OF 21 YEARS OF HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTCloud deployment, integrated management of multi-school areas and stabilization of the transfer mechanismThe product architecture is constantly being optimized, resulting in the current system of a stable, functional and cost-effective campus network NATSHEL_AUTH_BILLING.

Access Program I'll be right back. Telephone counselling